Deeper Weekend 2014

Choose your favorite writer

  • Adrian Simmons
    Adrian Simmons
  • Bryan Coleman
    Bryan Coleman
  • Greg Kyte
    Greg Kyte
  • guestblogger
  • Ian Crook
    Ian Crook
  • Jason Blumer
    Jason Blumer
  • Jennifer Blumer
    Jennifer Blumer
  • Scott Kregel
    Scott Kregel

REFM - Adrian Photo Square - CATOBCommerce. Hubbub. The noisy marketplace. The tens, hundreds, and thousands of small exchanges. In the store, online, over the phone, from an airplane. It’s like an ecology, the ecology of the economy. The creation and shifting of resources from one area of the ecology to another. All voluntarily. All based on what we value, on what we think is worth the expending and spending of resources. The values, where do they come from?

As entrepreneurs, we design “the value exchanges:” those interactions that bring together buyers, workers, suppliers, owners, and indirectly, their surrounding environments. If we’ve done our job well, each party leaves the exchange with greater value than they brought to it. In a very real sense, they are affirmed in that value through their interactions with the others. The whole process is a way of cooperating to make the imaginary real, the potential actual, the unseen seen. It also transcends the laws of matter: while the physical matter doesn’t increase, paradoxically the whole enchilada just grew, because it grew in a non-material dimension: in the minds and souls of the participating parties.




“The value exchanges” are preceded by a decision, and the savvy entrepreneur is really a decision architect. She’s created the exchange, but the decision is what gets the movement of the exchange activated. Architecting that decision is really a matter of leadership, of presenting the decider with their freedom. The frame of the decision proposes a truth about reality, what makes reality better, and how the exchange brings about that reality.

Every business is a hypothesis, or really two hypotheses: (1) an economic hypothesis, and (2) a human hypothesis. The economic hypothesis is a claim: that we can create more economic value than we consume. The human hypothesis is also a claim: that what we’re doing is good for the human person. In this way, every business is not only a hypothesis, it’s also a statement of belief: that what we’re doing creates value and is good for people. It’s why I think it’d be wise for every business to have an anthropologist on staff, or at least someone who asks questions about what it means to be human, what makes for better humanness, and how what we do contributes to that end for our customers.

Businesses can survive for a while on cheap sales: hyping product promises based on a vision of reality and definition of a human being that leads to purchases, but the truth always comes out in the end (although sometimes it can take generations for it to come to light). The best long-term strategy is to propose the good, and encourage people to direct their resources to what should truly be valued. Here we find the business owner who asks more than the question of what people will spend a buck on, but searches for what really makes a positive difference and helps. He explains it over and over again, one person at a time. He realizes that the existence of his business depends on a set of customers also sharing that belief, and that his enterprise is a bullhorn for that belief.

“The value exchanges” are actually “values exchanges” — manifesting what we think is important through the design of the business model. And in this way, business becomes a moral enterprise.


Adrian G. Simmons is a CPA innovating ways to put money in its place. He is Chief Creative Designer of his firm, Elements CPA, LLC where he works with the team to help their customers become financially strong, so they can focus on what truly matters in life. And he’s also a Practicing Fellow with the VeraSage Institute (the revolutionary think tank for professional knowledge firms), and Director of the Thriveal Accounting Laboratory (helping to accelerate the adoption of today’s innovations, and contribute to the imagining of tomorrow’s).

Other Thoughts
  • On 09-08-2015 at 4:52 pm, Melinda Guillemette said:

    This is so good. In believing that what we do helps humans (fundamentally rather than superficially), we can be more fearless in our presentation of ideas to that end.

    The title of your post says it all. Thanks, Adrian.

    • On 09-08-2015 at 8:49 pm, Adrian G. Simmons said:

      Thanks Melinda, and I absolutely agree: the more we’re able to come to terms with what we’re about, the more confidence we can approach our market with, the clearer messaging we can connect to them with, and the more effective we can be in serving them. I’d also argue, the better business we’ll be doing, in all meanings of that word.

  • Jason Blumer

    On 09-10-2015 at 12:43 pm, Jason Blumer said:

    I like your philosophical writing, dude. I once drew a picture like what you’ve presented here, but I put the ‘Owner’ at the center. Hmmm. You put ‘Value’ at the center. That changes my perception of what our firms do in a big way!

    It seems the most human thing to do is stop making myself the focus, and instead constantly review “am I creating more value than I’m capturing?”

    Question: does this preclude me from continuing to seek to capture as much value as possible in my business relationships?

    • On 09-10-2015 at 7:05 pm, Adrian G. Simmons said:

      Hey Jason, and thanks!

      About your question, it sounds like it hones in on the pricing of the value created in an exchange. I think the classic definition of price being ‘whatever a willing buyer and a willing seller agree to’, is probably a good measuring stick. Basically, the buyer and the seller have to come to an agreement on how to divide up the value they created together, and there’s no one way that makes sense, as long as it makes sense to the parties involved.

      Digging a little deeper, I would venture to say that the more unique the seller’s contribution to the value created, the more compelling their claim for an increased portion of the value. Or vice versa.

      So for a seller to increase their value retained, they have two approaches: (a) increase the uniqueness of the value they create, and/or (b) increase the value created overall. And thus the beauty of a properly functioning economy. 🙂

      All that to say, accountants in general have a tendency to undervalue their contribution to the exchange, and therefore under price. Often it’s because their pricing isn’t tied to value, but time, so they’re distracted from the bigger picture. And in the end, it ends up inhibiting their ability to pursue either/both Strategy A and Strategy B. Which in turn ends up hurting their customers, and stunting the natural market evolution. Not a pretty picture. 🙁


Join the party and leave a comment